CoronaVirus/Pfizer

© Shutterstock, screenshot/Pfizer/KJN

Vaccine makers have nothing to lose past marketing their experimental COVID-19 shots, even if they cause serious injury and expiry, as they enjoy full indemnity confronting injuries occurring from COVID-19 vaccines or any other pandemic vaccine nether the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Human action, passed in the U.S. in 2005.

The total extent of their COVID-19 vaccine indemnification agreements with countries, all the same, is a closely guarded secret, one that has remained highly confidential — until at present. A leaked certificate cleaved downward past Twitter user Ehden reveals the shocking terms of Pfizer'southward international COVID-xix vaccine agreements. He wrote:

"These agreements are confidential, but luckily i state did non protect the contract document well plenty, so I managed to become a hold of a copy. As you are about to run across, there is a practiced reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts."

An ironclad understanding, all on Pfizer'due south terms

The alleged indemnification understanding, reportedly between Pfizer and Republic of albania, was originally posted in snippets on Twitter, but Twitter now has them marked every bit "unavailable." Copies of the tweets are available on Treadreader, however.

The Albania agreement appears very like to some other contract, published online, betwixt Pfizer and the Dominican Commonwealth. It covers non only COVID-xix vaccines, but any product that enhances the apply or effects of such vaccines. Countries that purchase Pfizer'due south COVID-19 shot must admit that "Pfizer'south efforts to develop and industry the Production" are "subject to significant risks and uncertainties."

And in the event that a drug or other treatment comes out that can prevent, treat or cure COVID-19, the agreement stands, and the country must follow through with their lodge. Ivermectin , for instance, is non only condom, cheap and widely available only has been institute to reduce COVID-19 mort ality by 81% . Withal, it continues to be ignored in favor of more expensive, and less effective, treatments and mass experimental vaccination. Ehden wrote:

"If yous were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does non allow them to escape their contract, which states that fifty-fifty if a drug will be found to care for COVID19 the contract cannot be voided."

Even if Pfizer fails to deliver vaccine doses within their estimated commitment menses, the purchaser may not abolish the order. Farther, Pfizer tin can make adjustments to the number of contracted doses and their delivery schedule, "based on principles to be determined by Pfizer," and the country ownership the vaccines must "agree to any revision."

It doesn't matter if the vaccines are delivered severely late, even at a point when they're no longer needed, equally it's made articulate that

"Under no circumstances will Pfizer be subject to or liable for any belatedly delivery penalties." As yous might suspect, the contract besides "forbids returns under any circumstances."

The big secret: Pfizer charged U.South. More than Than Other Countries

While COVID-19 vaccines are "free" to receive in the U.S., they're being paid for by taxpayer dollars at a rate of $19.5011 per dose. Republic of albania, the leaked contract revealed, paid $12 per dose, while the EU paid $14.70 per shot. While charging dissimilar prices to unlike purchases is mutual in the drug industry, it'south often frowned upon.

In the example of the toll disparity between the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is said to have given a cost break to the EU because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine. Still, Ehden noted, "U.S. taxpayers got screwed past Pfizer, probably also State of israel." Also, Pfizer makes a bespeak to note that countries have no correct to withhold payment to the visitor for any reason.

Apparently, this includes in the case of receiving damaged goods. Purchasers of Pfizer's COVID-xix vaccines are not entitled to reject them "based on service complaints," unless they practice not conform to specifications or the FDA's Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations. And, Ehden adds, "This understanding is above any local police force of the land."

While the purchaser has almost no way of canceling the contract, Pfizer can stop the agreement in the result of a "fabric breach" of whatsoever term in their contract.

Safety and efficacy 'not currently known'

The purchaser of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine must too admit two facts that have largely been brushed under the rug: Both their efficacy and risks are unknown. According to section 5.5 of the contract:

"Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being speedily developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will go on to be studied subsequently provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser nether this Understanding.

"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Indemnification by the purchaser is also explicitly required by the contract, which states, under section 8.1:

"Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and agree harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, 3rd parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or whatsoever of their respective Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research ...
"from and against whatsoever and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation ... arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine ..."

Meanwhile, the purchaser must also keep the terms of the contract confidential for a catamenia of 10 years.

Not only does Pfizer take total indemnification, but there's also a section in the contract titled, "Assumption of Defense by Purchaser," which states that in the issue Pfizer suffers losses for which information technology is seeking indemnification, the purchaser

"shall promptly presume conduct and command of the defense of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of the Indemnitee with counsel acceptable to Indemnitee(southward), whether or not the Indemnified Merits is rightfully brought."

Ehden notes:

"Pfizer is making certain the country will pay for everything: 'Costs and expenses, including ... fees and disbursements of counsel, incurred by the Indemnitee(due south) in connection with any Indemnified Claim shall be reimbursed on a quarterly basis past Purchaser.'"

Buried in the March 17, 2020, Federal Register — the daily journal of the U.Southward. government — in a document titled, "Proclamation Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Human action for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-nineteen," is linguistic communication that establishes a new COVID-19 vaccine courtroom — similar to the federal vaccine courtroom that already exists.

In the U.S., vaccine makers already savor total indemnity against injuries occurring from this or any other pandemic vaccine under the PREP Human activity. If you're injured by a COVID vaccine (or a select group of other vaccines designated under the act), you lot'd have to file a bounty claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is funded by U.S. taxpayers via Congressional appropriation to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

While similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which applies to nonpandemic vaccines, the CICP is even less generous when it comes to compensation. As reported by Dr. Meryl Nass, the maximum payout you tin can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or expiry — is $250,000 per person; nevertheless, you'd accept to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP gives you a dime.

The CICP as well has a ane-year statute of limitations, so yous take to act quickly, which is as well difficult since it'southward unknown if long-term furnishings could occur more a yr later.

Pfizer accused of abuse of ability

Every bit is apparent in Pfizer's confidential contract with Republic of albania, the drug behemothic wants governments to guarantee the company will be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it. Pfizer has also demanded that countries put up sovereign assets , including bank reserves, military bases and diplomatic mission buildings, as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation.

New Delhi-based Globe Is Ane News (WION) reported in February 2021 that Brazil rejected Pfizer's demands, calling them "calumniating." The demands included that Brazil:

  1. "Waives sovereignty of its assets abroad in favor of Pfizer."
  2. Not apply its domestic laws to the company.
  3. Not penalize Pfizer for vaccine commitment delays.
  4. Exempt Pfizer from all civil liability for side effects.

STAT News also referred to concerns by legal experts, who also suggested Pfizer'due south demands were an abuse of power. Mark Eccleston-Turner, a lecturer in global health law at Keele Academy in England, told STAT:

"[Pfizer] is trying to eke out as much profit and minimize its risk at every juncture with this vaccine evolution and then this vaccine rollout. At present, the vaccine development has been heavily subsidized already. Then there's very minimal take chances for the manufacturer involved in that location."

Signs of COVID vaccine failure, adverse effects ascension

Pfizer continues to sign lucrative cloak-and-dagger vaccine deals across the globe. In June 2021, they signed one of their biggest contracts to date — with the Philippine authorities for xl meg doses .

Meanwhile, COVID-19 "breakthrough cases," which used to exist called vaccine failures, are on the rising. Co-ordinate to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), equally of July 19, 5,914 people who had been fully vaccinated for COVID-xix were hospitalized or died from COVID-19.

In the U.Chiliad., equally of July 15, 87.5% of the developed population had received one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 67.1% had received two. Nevertheless, symptomatic cases amidst partially and fully vaccinated are on the rise , with an boilerplate of 15,537 new infections a day being detected, a 40% increase from the week before.

In a July 19 study from the CDC, the agency as well reported that the Vaccine Agin Event Reporting Arrangement (VAERS) had received 12,313 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — more than doubling from the 6,079 reports of decease from the calendar week earlier.

Soon after the report, however, they reverted the number to the 6,079 from the week before, indicating past default that no deaths from the vaccine had occurred that week, raising serious questions about transparency and vaccine safe.

Many other adverse events are as well appearing, ranging in risks from the biologically active SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the vaccine to blood clots, reproductive toxicity and myocarditis ( heart inflammation ). Every bit you tin can run across in the confidential indemnification agreements, however, even if the vaccine turns out to be a dismal failure — and a risk to short- and long-term health — countries have no recourse, nor does anyone who received the experimental shots.

One question that nosotros should all be asking is this: If the COVID-19 vaccines are, in fact, as safe and effective as the manufacturers claim, why do they require this level of indemnification?

The views and opinions expressed in this commodity are those of the authors and exercise not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defence.